The Last prophet- Concept of Islam and Christianity is Anti Vedic.

A HINDU SHOULD NOT TESTIFY MOHAMED OR JESUS  AS THE FINAL PROPHET(S) OF DIVINITY.

• The Last prophet- Concept of Islam is Anti Vedic.
• Ascribing finality of divinity to a person or a scripture is non-Vedic, hence it is unbecoming of a Hindu.

Islam states that Mohamed is the last prophet and no more prophets are to be sent by the Allah for the further guidance of mankind. Hence it may be right for a Muslim to testify that Mohamed is the final prophet of Allah in the Islamic light.

Can a Hindu testify the same?

Do the Vedhas of Hindus justify this testimony?

“..Yadha Yadha hi dharmasya glanir bhavathi Bharatha..”

Srimad Bagavad Geetha, the Hindu scripture quotes from Chapter 4 verse 7, that Paramathma, the Supreme Lord would appear on earth in the human form whenever the Dharma (righteousness) on earth gets deteriorated. Hence it is unlawful and blasphemous for a Hindu to testify that Mohamed is the last prophet of Divinity.

If a Hindu testifies that someone is the finality of the divinity, then he is unbecoming a Hindu and he must  be among the lost.

WHAT SHOULD A HINDU TESTIFY?

A Hindu should testify that the Supreme Lord would assume human form at HIS own will to guide mankind to the supreme truth, the right knowledge i.e. Brahmajnana from time to time.

Brahmajnana will lead a Hindu to the realization of the eternal truth and not to the sensual eternity.

Lord Krishna said ‘SAMBHAVAMI YUGE YUGE’- I Shall reappear millennium after millennium (Geetha Chapter7, verse 8).

Bagavan never prophesied that he would stop appearing after few years by just handing over a book to get the things done automatically for millennium after millennium.